PROCESS
A Steering Committee, comprising the CEOs of NHMRC and HRC
and a representative of Wellcome Trust will be formed to
coordinate the Scheme. The Steering Committee or their
delegates will provide advice and guidance to potential
applicants on access issues, negotiating with potential
applicants in developing countries and other issues relating
to the application process.
Appointment of
Assessment Committee
The Wellcome Trust, NHMRC and HRC will appoint an
Assessment Committee that has the required expertise to
conduct the application assessment process.
The NHMRC will nominate four representatives to the
Committee from Australia and the HRC will nominate four
representatives from New Zealand. The Trust will select an
additional four panellists who will sit on this committee. An
independent chair will be appointed. Expenses for the
panellists will be jointly shared by the parties.
The Wellcome Trust will, in accordance with its own policy,
take responsibility for managing processes related to
conflicts of interest in relation to the Assessment Committee.
However, the HRC and the NHMRC undertake to inform the
Wellcome Trust of any conflicts of interest, both actual and
perceived, that may come to their attention.
[ ^
to top ]
Grants Assessment Process
The two-stage process will be administered by the Wellcome
Trust in the United Kingdom.
Key Information The following is proposed for the
applications round:
Preliminary Applications to be forwarded to Wellcome Trust
- 15 Oct 2002 Outcome of Preliminary Application process
and invitations to submit full proposal -26 Nov 2002 Full
applications submission deadline - 14 Feb 2003 Announcement
of Awards and press release - 30 July 2003
The scheme will be advertised in August 2002 and applicants
will be invited to submit a Preliminary Application. Following
assessment of the Preliminary Applications, successful
applicants will be invited to submit Full Applications. The
application pro forma and supporting information will be
available electronically on the Wellcome Trust, NHMRC and HRC
web-sites.
Peer Review
The Assessment Committee will screen the Preliminary
Applications against specified criteria. Assessment Committee
members from Wellcome Trust, Australia and New Zealand will
meet as a group in their respective countries to assess the
Preliminary Applications. Once each group has reached a
consensus on rating the Preliminary Applications, a
teleconference involving the Steering Committee (or their
delegates) can finalise the rating for each Preliminary
Application.
Short-listed applicants will be required to submit Full
Applications by 14 February 2003. In consultation with NHMRC
and HRC, Wellcome Trust will organise for Full Applications to
be assessed by experts, who will provide a written assessment
with a recommended budget for the applications they have been
invited to review. The assessment reports will be circulated
to the applicants who will be provided an opportunity to
respond to/rebut comments made in the report concerning their
application. A face to face meeting of Assessment Committee
members will be held on 14 July 2003 to assess the Full
Applications and peer review, applicant responses if any, to
make a final determination as to the successful applicants and
finalise recommended budgets for each approved grant.
On or around 17 July 2003, final recommendations for
funding will be made by the Assessment Committee to Wellcome
Trust/NHMRC/HRC. The awards should be announced as soon as
possible thereafter, noting that the NHMRC is required to seek
approval of the funding recommendations from Australia's
Minister for Health and Ageing.
Monitoring of Awards
Award recipients will be required to provide annual
Progress Reports, detailing progress against milestones,
scientific achievements, administration and expenditure of the
award. The Wellcome Trust, NHMRC and HRC will monitor the
overall progress of the collaborations. It is likely that all
awards will require a mid-term review and possibly a
site-visit in the third year to guarantee funding for the
remainder of the five year period.
Holding other awards concurrently
Principal Investigators in Australia and New Zealand will
be eligible to hold or apply for NHMRC or HRC funding in other
funding schemes (note that conditions may apply for some types
of support schemes).
[ ^
to top ]
Intellectual Property Rights
For the Wellcome Trust:
As a charity, the Wellcome Trust is under an obligation to
ensure that the useful results of the research that it funds
are applied for public good. In accordance with its policy on
Intellectual Property, the Trust requires that:
- The IPR resides with the institution, at least
initially;
- There are mechanisms in place to promote the management
of IP and an equitable distribution of benefits to the
investors, host organisations and where appropriate the
funders (the relative benefits are a matter of degree rather
than absolute; benefits would not be totally to an
individual or to a commercial organisation as this would be
outside the Trust's charitable remit);
- The Trust is informed of any dealings in IP and at this
point requires confirmation that the IPR is managed in light
of principles above.
- The Trust reserves the right to 'step in' if
exploitation is not being pursued.
For Australia:
In accordance with NHMRC's policy in this area, the NHMRC
will require that:
- an agreement concerning Intellectual Property rights is
put in place prior to lodging the full application. Such
agreement will need to safeguard the rights of all
institutions participating in the project, including
institutions in the regional countries. A copy of this
agreement must be included as an attachment to the full
application and contract; and
- an Administering Institution ensures that the ownership
of the Award Material and Intellectual Property in the Award
Material, and any other Intellectual Property rights in
relation to the Award Material, will be dealt with as
provided for by that agreement.
For New Zealand: The HRC will require that:
- an agreement concerning Intellectual Property rights is
put in place prior to signing the contract. Such agreement
will need to safeguard the rights of all institutions
participating in the project, including institutions in the
regional countries. A copy of this agreement must be
included as an attachment to the contract.
Ethics Approvals
Wellcome Trust, NHMRC and HRC have similar
requirements.
The NHMRC requires that institutions meet the ethics
criteria outlined in the Standard Deed of Agreement, which may
change from time to time. The criteria at the time of writing
are outlined in Institutional
Approvals
HRC will require that all research studies whether
conducted in New Zealand or in a developing country, which
involve human participation, to be approved by an accredited
Ethics Committee in New Zealand. Such research will also
require approval from an appropriate authority in the
developing country.
Animal experimentation
The Trust requires overseas institutions would be
responsible for ensuring that the experiments have been
authorised by national and local licensing authorities where
they exist and that the work is carried out as described in
the proposal.
The NHMRC requires that institutions meet the ethics
criteria outlined in the Standard Deed of Agreement, which may
change from time to time. The criteria at the time of writing
are outlined in Institutional
Approvals
HRC will require all research studies involving animals to
be approved by an appropriate Animal Ethics Committee in New
Zealand. Such research will also require approval from an
appropriate authority in the developing country if research
involving animals is to be conducted outside New
Zealand.
 |
- This document is provided as an
Adobe Acrobat PDF file. If you wish to view this file
you will need to install the Adobe Acrobat Reader on
your computer to view it. The Adobe Acrobat Reader is
available free of charge from Adobe's website  | |